harpua13
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 49 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Another lie by Dreck Nash - 2004/06/03 01:36
Dreck (Nov. 18, 2003):
You wrote a web page misinterpreting all your opponent's positions without giving them a chance to refute you, and that's a particularly cowardly and dishonest approach when trying to deal with an opponent. Not only that, that page contained an outright lie that you've failed to address or put right. In it, you claim to have put a number to the collateral deaths in agriculture in a mock comment to a quote I made which you lifted from here.
{Note Dreck's claim that I have "failed to address or put right" his fuckheaded attack. Also note even he acknowledges that I was mocking him.}
By me, in response to the same false accusation (the first time he mentioned it) (May 2, 2002):
For the record, neither I nor anyone else claims to have an actual number. The claim, from the original context, is that the number of
CD's per acre (per hectare for you) is the same for a typical vegetarian diet as for an omnivorous diet and that you willingly contribute to deaths you claim are morally wrong.
right" this intentionally mocking statement, I did it on the very fucking day you first posed the damn question. Are you going to repeat this lie for another 18 months? In any event, at least get it through your thick head: That's not my fucking webpage. I am not Ward Clark.
Now, for your dumbass little statements about Donna and her former type of employment: give it up. She verbally flogged your incompetent, lying ass all by herself so provoking me does nothing but make us both laugh. You've been proven wrong, again. You have no credibility.
You're a joke and the joke is getting old.
Popular posts by harpua13
The latest Jethroism (Destined to b...
Logic 101 (for Dreck)
Somebody stick a fork in Dreck, He'...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Daddyo152
User
Expert
| Posts: 109 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Another lie by Dreck Nash - 2004/06/03 03:13
Then you did lie by stating you had the actual number.
[My statement:
The only trouble is, is that it's a next to useless argument when it comes to challenging our lifestyle.
Nobody can put a number to these deaths, & even though they do exist, are not our responsibility anyway.
Kevin's reply:
We have put a number to them, and you are responsible for them.]
http://www.pathwai.org/tpa_loon_o_month.htm
The claim, from the context in your web page states you "have put a number to them." It doesn't mention anything about CD's per hectare, or CD's per person following a vegetarian diet which can be successfully disputed. It simply states "We have put a number to them, and you are responsible for them." It's a lie, and you haven't put it right.
At the very top of the page you co-wrote with Ward, it reads;
"Brought to you by Kevin Brandon and Ward M. Clark "
http://www.pathwai.org/tpa_loon_o_month.htm
It is your page, so stop lying, pimp.
If you're going to go around calling people whores, you should expect that some of us here who know what your wife does for a living will question why you do it. Brandi, or Donna, or whatever you call her does take off her clothes to satisfy the lusty little perverts who pay her. She's admitted she also dresses up in a schoolgirl's outfit to get the more pervy customers to pay even more attention to her.
Did she, fuck. She limped on here with nothing and limped out again with my boot up her smeggy arse;
[start Behemoth (me)]
After creating an incentive for men to have sex with schoolgirls, don't you think you ought to ask them not to commit harms?
Don't you think it odd that men pay you to help them fantasize about having underage sex, and would you be surprised if a schoolgirl victims' parents thought you were responsible for her rape after you provided the rapists incentive?
[end]
Behemoth 2002-11-27
But I like a good laugh, Kev, and I'm bored with laughing at all the other nebbishes here, so you've come along with your great fat gob just in time, really.
Popular posts by Daddyo152
Swamp lies to pretend Dererk forges...
A question for Rick Etter on grass ...
A rejection of utilitarianism, by T...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
harpua13
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 49 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Another lie by Dreck Nash - 2004/06/03 07:30
You're a proven liar, Fuckwad. You've been discrdited: AGAIN. So fuck off you chiseling little weasel. Don't use complicated words (for you) like "mock" when you have no clue as to their meaning. Here's yet another example of your dishonest editing. You're worthless. As I also told you in my original reply, which you LIED about, Ward gave me co-credit only because the original idea for the contest was mine. You can't read and you have no concept of honesty. Why do you lie Dreck?
There's only one of you, fuckwad, so stop using phrases like "some of us" to make it sound like you have company. Nobody gives a rat's ass what a proven liar and fat-ass coward has to say.
Brandi, or Donna, or whatever you call
Dreck, you're an idiot, you've lost every argument you've ever had here because you your simply too fucking stupid to comprehend anything beyond the simplest of conversations.
Dreck, you simply do not get it. It's you EVERYONE is laughing at.
so you've come along with
Dreck, look up "context" and after that, look up every word in that definition and continue the process for a few years. Eventually, you might gain a clue, but it's highly doubtful.
Popular posts by harpua13
The latest Jethroism (Destined to b...
Logic 101 (for Dreck)
Somebody stick a fork in Dreck, He'...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Daddyo152
User
Expert
| Posts: 109 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Another lie by Dreck Nash - 2004/06/03 10:55
I've just proved that is you who's the liar here, pimp.
It is your web page, and your name is written right at the top of it to prove it. You're as stupid as they come.
How can you honestly hope to pretend that that isn't your web page when it's got, "Brought to you by
Kevin Brandon and Ward M. Clark " written right across the top of it? What sort of a liar, apart from you, would even dream of denying it's your web page?
I do remember Sue Bishop taking a large slice out of Brandi's smeggy arse over this some time ago, so your wrong to think I'm the only one who might be wondering why you call every female on these groups a whore, especially since you did marry one and pimp her arse every weekend for a few bucks.
Well, pimp? Isn't it true that the street corner slut you married admitted here on Usenet to dressing up in a schoolgirl's outfit to turn on a bunch of perves for money, that it was part of her job?
Oh come on, pimp. You can do better than to just repeat the same old, "you lost" and, "you're an idiot" after all this time on a.a.e.v., surely? When are you going to start telling me I have comprehension problems?
That's ususally another one of your tired old favourites.
Well, pimp? Why does the slut you married pander to and incite perverts? How much does she get paid for all her strenuous efforts in giving all those peds a boner?
Weak weak weak. If you're going to hang around here flapping your big gob off, you're going to have to come up with something a lot, lot better than what you've tried and failed with in the past. The joke is on you, pimp.
Popular posts by Daddyo152
Swamp lies to pretend Dererk forges...
A question for Rick Etter on grass ...
A rejection of utilitarianism, by T...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
|
post new topic