cdcollectr
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 28 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Denying the Antecedent - a fallacy - 2007/01/14 02:30
Stupid fuckwitted pig-headed Dreck:
1) if x, then y 2) not x therefore 3) not y
That is a ***valid*** form of propositional logic because it is presented in a ***valid*** form, [...], [emphasis added]
Kenneth S. Pope, Ph.D.:
Denying the Antecedent
This ***fallacy*** takes the form of:
If x, then y.
Not x.
therefore: not y.
http://kspope.com/fallacies/fallacies.php [emphasis added]
Dreck says it is a valid form; Kenneth Pope, Ph.D., says it is invalid (a fallacy). Whom do you believe?
Popular posts by cdcollectr
Karen Winter of Santa Fe, NM advoca...
Ash Wednesday
USDA vets question agency's mad ...
|
post new topic