post new topic

Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu

Related Forum Topics:
Where's that fucking Dwarf?
Where's that fucking Dwarf?
Karen Winter of Santa Fe, NM advocates adu...
Karen Winter of Santa Fe, NM advocates adu...
Karen Winter of Santa Fe, NM advocates ...
A Whole Bunch of Seitan Recipes


Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu - 2006/06/05 01:17 That was a bunch a babble, and you know it.
What a wanker! Do you honestly think that talking out of your arse will persuade anyone that your statements don't prove your support for vivisection?
No, it wasn't, you fucking liar, else why did you conclude the paragraph by talking about fucking rabbits?
""for example if one rabbit would save 1000 humans, then I could accept that the rabbit should die."

You even lie like a fucking anti, Liehar.



  Popular posts by Forbin50
Zakhar supports vivisection
Newborn Calf Survives Being Disc...
Non-Human Molecule Absorbed by E...
  | | | post reply
re:Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu - 2006/06/05 04:56 I do exactly as I please, filth.

1) Why have you lied to everyone and pretended to support animal rights?
"Be careful. I consider myself as an active advocate of animal rights." Zakhar Date: 2002-07-19

2) Why do you consider yourself to be an animals rights advocate while condemning animals to the misery and torture of vivisectionists?
"for example if one rabbit would save 1000 humans, then I could accept that the rabbit should die." Zakhar 2003-02-02

3) How can you claim to believe in animal rights *as much as* human rights while allowing only one set of rights holders to be spared from the vivisectionists?
"I believe in animal rights as much as human rights." Zakhar 2003-09-27



  Popular posts by Forbin50
Zakhar supports vivisection
Newborn Calf Survives Being Disc...
Non-Human Molecule Absorbed by E...
  | | | post reply
re:Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu - 2006/06/05 09:33 I would not kill that flea, even if I thought it would save the entire World, for if the entire World's existence rested on the life of that flea I would have to conclude that the World is too insignificant to bother trying to save. That's why.

I wouldn't kill it. I would remove it.

I've answered your crappy little question on that flea, given you the reasons for my answer, and got you to agree that you know I wouldn't kill it. So now I will pose some for you. I've put them to you before, and even now you still try to dodge them by claiming I need to answer yours first. Well, you can't try that one anymore because you've conceded you have understood my answer.

1) Why have you lied to everyone and pretended to support animal rights?
"Be careful. I consider myself as an active advocate of animal rights." Zakhar Date: 2002-07-19

2) Why do you consider yourself to be an animals rights advocate while condemning animals to the misery and torture of vivisectionists?
"for example if one rabbit would save 1000 humans, then I could accept that the rabbit should die." Zakhar 2003-02-02

3) How can you claim to believe in animal rights *as much as* human rights while allowing only one set of rights holders to be spared from the vivisectionists?
"I believe in animal rights as much as human rights." Zakhar 2003-09-27



  Popular posts by Forbin50
Zakhar supports vivisection
Newborn Calf Survives Being Disc...
Non-Human Molecule Absorbed by E...
  | | | post reply
re:Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu - 2006/06/05 13:34 Don't give us that line 3 crap, and then post an unethically snipped post with you vile venom spewed all over it.

I'll give you an opportunity to answer the ALL the points IN CONTEXT.

Others will be able to see how you have trimmed the post to suit you lack of intellect and honesty.

You're reusing the second false point in this argument, it does not make the first issue true.

The "any realistic value" comment was aimed at research like "A study of the effects of alcohol on goldfish" (A real life study).

I wrote it, I should know what I meant.

Read it IN context "Most animals die for experiments that do not save or extend human life. Some you must know are devoid of any realistic use"

Some experiments "are devoid of any realistic use"

If a 1000 rabbits were used, then 1 000 000 lives would have to be saved.
I'm not aware that there is any drug that has been developed with animals that has that kind of impact, are you?

No they do not.

Calm down Derek, take a pain killer.



  Popular posts by donpuggi
Interesting link on fruits and vege...
~~jonnies~~ Claims his lying is con...
Derek's View of Animals
  | | | post reply
re:Line 3 too etc. was Gutless Zakhar supports vivisection, bu - 2006/06/05 16:51 You've tried insults, Latin phrases you don't understand, trying to change, unethical snipping now you're resorting to asking unrelated questions.

Answer the question Derek. - Your lack of an attempt at answering it displays that you may have a weakness in your position that you are afraid of exposing.

I'll start it off for you:

"I would not allow the killing of a flea to save all humanity, but would kill the same flea to save my dog from suffering because......."



  Popular posts by donpuggi
Interesting link on fruits and vege...
~~jonnies~~ Claims his lying is con...
Derek's View of Animals
  | | | post reply

Related Products:
   Rachel Perry Line Control, Hi Potency E & Pure Retinol A, 2 Oz (56 G)
   Vaxa, Cholesten-ldl, Supports The Lowering Of Cholesterols Levels, Hom...
   Iso-tech Hypertenol, Supports Normal Blood Pressure, 30 Vegetarian Cap...