jam_fan
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 39 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Liar Jon's premise is both true and false, or was it - 2007/03/17 10:44
No. They don't always occur, so they can hardly be called a fact in crop production.
Non causa pro causa
1.. Type-Level: A causal law has the form:
Events of type C cause events of type E.
Here, we are not talking about a causal relation holding between two particular events, but the general causal relation holding between instances of two types of event. For example, when we say that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer, we are not talking about an individual act of smoking causing a particular case of lung cancer.
Rather, we mean that smoking is a type of event which causes another type of event, namely, cancer.
Mistakes about type-level causation are the result of confusing correlation with causation.
Two types of event may occur simultaneously, or one type always following the other type, without there being a causal relation between them. One common source of non-causal correlations between two event-types is when both are effects of a third type of event.
http://gncurtis.home.texas.net/index.html
"effeminate", you ignorant dolt. It's indomitable,
Jon, just totally indomitable.
I don't see any causal link between my trade with him and the method he uses to satisfy my demand.
It doesn't instruct him to farm one way or the other.
Those options are his, and he, being completely autonomous is responsible for his actions. I blame him on the basis that he is a morally responsible agent carrying obligations to endure the consequences of his actions.
Your claim that a person is responsible for another's bad actions is mere opinion on your part. You're welcome to your own opinion, but it is an established fact.
[Unsnipping my valid response]
Non causa pro causa
1.. Type-Level: A causal law has the form:
Events of type C cause events of type E.
Here, we are not talking about a causal relation holding between two particular events, but the general causal relation holding between instances of two types of event. For example, when we say that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer, we are not talking about an individual act of smoking causing a particular case of lung cancer.
Rather, we mean that smoking is a type of event which causes another type of event, namely, cancer.
Mistakes about type-level causation are the result of confusing correlation with causation.
Two types of event may occur simultaneously, or one type always following the other type, without there being a causal relation between them. One common source of non-causal correlations between two event-types is when both are effects of a third type of event.
http://gncurtis.home.texas.net/index.html
I don't believe in taking the blame for another's wrongdoing, so I do say it in all honesty and with a clear conscience. This FACT clearly irritates you for some reason, but that's your weakness and you'll just have to get over it.
I say it to myself every hour, and if someone's in the room with me I say it to them every half hour.
Did you know I'm an ethical vegan who lives a death-free life, Jon?
You've snipped the rest of it out which proves you stated a premise can be both true and false, so here it is again.
[start me] [Jonathan Ball]
Of course it can be both, nitwit.
[end]
Date: 2003-06-22
But you're wrong.
A proposition that is offered in support of the truth of another proposition (the conclusion) in an argument.
The meaning of a sentence that makes a claim, that is, a sentence that can either be true or false.
http://www.nwmissouri.edu/~rfield/gloss.HTML
A proposition is a form of words in which the predicate is affirmed or denied of the subject of a declarative sentence.
A proposition is the meaning of a declarative sentence.
Declarative sentences are either true or false.
Popular posts by jam_fan
Logic insists farmers cause them
Bwahahahaha
Depression and veganism
|
post new topic